‘He’s 15 metres through the line’: NRL world erupts after Roosters robbed by ‘ridiculous’ Bunker call

The obstruction rule is meant to be black and white, but at the moment it’s 50 shades of grey and has left fans, players and coaches utterly confused after the Roosters were denied a clear try in their 22-16 loss to the Panthers.

The defending premiers were comfortably the better side and would have won by a lot more had the Roosters not struck late with a couple of tries to make the score look a lot more respectable.

The only place to watch every game of every round LIVE with no ad-breaks during play is Fox League, available on Kayo. New to Kayo? Start your free trial today >

But in the end the margin was only six points, with the Roosters denied a try to Joseph Manu which could have changed the complexion of the match.

The former Golden Boot winner danced through the defence and spectacularly put the ball down, only for Bunker official Chris Butler to spot what he thought was an obstruction 20 metres away from the play.

Jared Waerea-Hargreaves had run through the line and stopped, but Penrith fullback Dylan Edwards was no chance of getting to him.

“He is required to stop prior to interfering with any defenders, at this point he stops Dylan Edwards from being able to slide and assist in defending this play, which is an obstruction,” Butler said.

What made it worse was that Sunia Turuva was awarded a try for the Panthers even though Liam Martin ran through as the lead runner and interfered with Sitili Tupouniua and Luke Keary as they came across in cover defence.

Roosters coach Trent Robinson was clearly frustrated when asked about Manu’s disallowed try in his post-match press conference.

“Sitili got knocked over in our one, and was he going to save the try? No, he wasn’t. I don’t think he (Edwards) would have got there either on Joey Manu,” Robinson said.

“I feel like there were two different rulings in that case.

“I don’t want to blow it out of proportion too much, but sometimes they’re black and white with their decision, and then sometimes they’ve got the decision-making component and it varies on when they apply it. That’s probably what happened.

“They were black and white with the obstruction because Edwards changes his line as well, and so they were black and white with the call. But on the one where there was an obstruction, they leave it to interpretation.

“I don’t think we get it that wrong, to be honest. There are highlights because we scrutinise them well. It didn’t fall in our favour tonight, and it might at some point.”

The contentious ruling comes just days after NRL head of football Graham Annesley clarified why Manly’s Jake Trbojevic was penalised for obstruction when he stopped in the line.

That decision split opinions but made sense when Annesley explained it, however there’s no way he can give this decision the seal of approval.

“You look up and a player gets taken out 20 metres away from the ball,” a “surprised” James Tedesco said.

“If I’m in that position as a fullback, it’s pretty hard to get there and I’m not sure I’d make a difference.”

Panthers coach Ivan Cleary has done his best to avoid talking about controversial calls, but he let slip that he has major issues with the obstruction interpretation.

“I’m kind of trying to avoid talking about bunkers and stuff this year. I’m going to keep that going tonight,” he said.

“If you got me at the right time on the right night then I could talk for half an hour, but I’m not going to tonight.

“It is what it is. You win some, you lose some.

“I’ll say one thing – I feel like every time we’ve done a black and white interpretation in rugby league, it’s been a failure.

“I’m not saying that was the case tonight – I’m not saying yes or no – but every time we have, it doesn’t work. That’s just my opinion.”

The call overshadowed a terrific Penrith performance without Nathan Cleary, James Fisher-Harris and Scott Sorensen, with the premiers unlucky to have not won by more given Tupouniua was awarded a dubious try, while Izack Tago could have been given the benefit of the doubt with a potential try of his own.

“I thought that Tago one could have been a try,” skipper Isaah Yeo said.

“I thought they could have looked at the Tupouniua one a little bit more as well, so it goes both ways.

“Over the course of the season it probably evens itself out.”

The decision caught the ire of Fox League commentators Andrew Voss and Michael Ennis who were left stunned the try was disallowed.

“Hang on a second we are going for the obstruction in field, that was miles away… do they want him to run to Randwick?” Voss asked.

“How far has he got to run? Come on. He’s run through the line… surely Edwards dodges him there, come on. That’s one out.

“That can’t be what we’ve written the rule for surely, what a contrast that is to the Jake Trbojevic one last week. He’s just run 15 metres through the line.”

“We just continue to look to take tries away,” Ennis added.

The rugby league world were left equally stunned after the Roosters were stripped of the four-pointer, with the call being labelled “ridiculous”.