Mick Malthouse has weighed in on the drama between Carlton and Sam Docherty.
Plus details on the league’s news illicit drugs policy have been revealed. MORE IN AFL DAILY.
Watch every match of every round of the AFL Premiership Season LIVE and ad-break free during play on FOX FOOTY, available on Kayo Sports | New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1.
WHAT’S GAMBLING REALLY COSTING YOU? Set a deposit limit. For Free and confidential support call 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au.
MALTHOUSE QUESTIONS ON DOCHERTY, BLUES DRAMA
Former Carlton coach Mick Malthouse disagrees with the club’s decision to ban Sam Docherty from a function in the fallout from his scathing Opening Round criticism.
Docherty was scrapped from appearing at a club event on Thursday night ahead of Carlton’s Round 1 clash with Richmond for the ex-Blues skipper’s expletive laden comments that were aired without his permission on close friend Dan Gorringe’s podcast.
Docherty won’t hold any official role at the Blues until at least their Round 6 meeting with arch rival Collingwood.
And Malthouse, who coached Docherty in his first couple of seasons at Carlton, questioned if that was the right move from his former club.
“By banning a player who has played so many years there, it’s almost like (they’ve said) ‘well that’s one wrong, we’ll make it wrong as well’,” Malthouse told Code Sports.
“You’ve got to be bigger than the individual making a comment.
“Because what you’ve done now is gone tit for tat, and I wouldn’t have thought that’s the right way to do it.”
Malthouse, who holds the AFL’s all-time games coached record, suggested Docherty was also in the wrong.
But the three-time premiership coach thinks the beloved Blue’s standing at the club should make his comments “redeemable”.
“The cool light of dawn, you get up and think ‘that wasn’t the best thing to say, regardless of whether I thought it was going to be on record or not … yes, the club’s been great to me’,” Malthouse said.
“You’re just giving a different version to a different group and probably the frustrations of the game, everything is out the window and you’re able to think a bit better.
“I’m not totally convinced they’ve (the club) got it right.”
AFL’S ILLICIT DRUGS POLICY REVAMPED
The AFL will abolish ‘strikes’ and move towards a more detailed, regular hair-testing model as part of its updated illicit drugs policy.
The Herald Sun and Age reported the looming changes to the illicit drugs policy, which is still yet to be finalised.
The policy is also set to include AFLW players for the first time since the league was formed in 2017.
Players that submit one positive sample will be removed from the game and put into a medical slipstream, where they’ll be made to undergo management and education programs.
‘Weird time’: Merrett on trade period | 01:21
Those players will remain stood down under they meet the necessary requirements through consultation with the AFL’s medical experts.
It’s believed players will need to make a financial contribution to their treatment in some cases as part of the policy.
The new code, which could be finalised with the AFL Players’ Association within weeks, would see players get hair tested multiple times in season and replace urine testing.
It will provide more detailed information, as hair testing can detect substances up to three months in advance, whereas urine testing only shows up positive results for a few days.
Under the current model, two ‘strikes’ — or positive drug tests — results in the automatic suspension of a player. Though a player that self-reports can avoid recording a strike.
Discussion about this post