In an industry always shrouded in mystery, Williams’ forthcoming honesty in response to Friday’s stunning chassis debacle should be commended.
It doesn’t make their situation at the Australian Grand Prix any less humiliating – but it certainly could’ve been handled worse.
FP2 at Albert Park was not even complete before Williams had already confirmed to broadcasters that indeed, it did not have a third chassis ready in Melbourne, meaning it might run only one car for the weekend.
F1 SATURDAY LIVE: ‘All the f***ing’ time’ — Star fumes over F1 rival; Piastri’s hilarious ‘idiot’ message
Watch the FORMULA 1 ROLEX AUSTRALIAN GRAND PRIX LIVE in 4K and ad-break free during racing, Sunday 3pm AEDT. New to Kayo? Start Your Free Trial Today >
How ‘Drive to Survive’ changed Formula 1 | 01:34
Before the night was over, Williams was issuing a lengthy press release, while team principal James Vowles stared down the barrel of the camera to explain the humbling next steps.
Williams was officially down to one car, and it would be Alex Albon to drive it – not Logan Sargent – despite the fact it was the Briton who caused the wreckage at Turn 6.
In announcing the decision, Vowles said the team was guilty of producing an “unacceptable” situation in modern Formula 1.
True that Ferrari, Red Bull or Mercedes would never be in this position given their resources – but could you imagine such a contrite admission from any of them?
But it didn’t stop there.
Williams invited open media to their hospitality suite in the paddock on Saturday morning for a lengthy Q and A with Vowles.
Even if Vowles looked like a man who lost plenty of sleep the night before, he hadn’t lost any of his polish in answering the hard questions.
The details remain damning, and paint an unflattering picture of operations at Williams, which Vowles – Mercedes’ strategy director during its golden era – has been hired to fix.
For example, he discovered earlier this year that his team was using Microsoft Excel to handle the management of about 20,000 individual components.
“The Excel list was a joke. Impossible to navigate and impossible to update,” Vowles said of the list.
How ‘Drive to Survive’ changed Formula 1 | 01:34
FRIDAY NEWS
Talking Pts: Driver axed mid-weekend in cruel call; legit home podium bid for Piastri
‘Can’t believe it’: Brutal end to ‘unacceptable’ fiasco; ‘special’ lap boosts boilover hope
On Saturday, Vowles explained that the allocation of finite resources, and wholesale changes to operations at Grove, meant that development of a third chassis for 2024 was put on the backburner.
“As we went through large changes in organisation, performance and technology changes in the back end and process, we started to push out, fundamentally, certain elements,” he said.
“There’s a finite amount of resources and as we went through an inefficient structure, making transformation at the same time, we started to cause problems.
“In this particular case, the third chassis became delayed, and delayed, and delayed.
“We were very late with these cars and pushed everything to the limit.”
It was around now during the questioning that Albon arrived at Williams, and had to be turned around at the door so he didn’t interrupt the session.
An unfortunate coincidence for Williams while trying to explain how it’s looking to improve its organisational operations.
With Williams one of the final, true independent teams on the grid, and one steeped in championship-winning history, there is a general tone of sympathy in the paddock. No one wants to kick the little guy when they’re down.
There’s also a big human element at play here.
Vowles did not hide the fact that the team’s morale has been damaged, Sargent’s confidence has been hit, and that Albon is feeling the weight of guilt on his shoulders.
He said that the team must use the hurt for the better.
“One of the things I did yesterday was bring the team together and explain why we have to pull together as a team, not apart, and why we have to use this as a catalyst for change,” Vowles said.
“We should never be in a situation in the top tier of motorsport where we cannot produce two cars on the grid.”
Asked what Albon’s reaction has been to moving Sargent aside, he added: “He’s thankful for it. He’s conflicted. He knows he’s the reason why Logan isn’t able to race today.
“There’s thanks and frustration all mixed into it at the same time for both.”
Perhaps the harshest part of all now for Williams is not the brutal call it has made, but the fact it will need to sit with it at Albert Park for two more days.
BIZARRE CALL OVER WILD CRASH THAT DOESN’T ADD UP
How Nikola Tsolov was only handed a three-place grid penalty for sparking a shocking F3 crash on Friday continues to baffle the paddock.
Stewards took a surprisingly soft touch when adjudicating the moment that Tsolov effectively swerved directly into Alex Dunne, who then crashed into a wall.
Tsolov’s explanation was bizarre – he initially claimed it was “unintentional” – but that was completely at odds with the report from the stewards.
The stewards reported that Tsolov “stated that his lap was affected by (Dunne) and he wanted the driver to be aware of his presence and that he was being impeded.
“(Tsolov) deviated from his normal racing line to drive close to car #9 to highlight his presence.
“He unfortunately misjudged this action and collided with car #9.”
What’s arguably more bizarre, however, is that the stewards sympathised with Tsolov for this, saying that the final outcome was “unintentional”. They allowed him to race on Saturday with only a minor penalty.
Had Dunne been seriously injured by the crash, would the same penalty for effectively the same infringement, have been applied?
Part of the stewards’ explanation said that previous precedents influenced their final decision, but it’s hard to think of many times a driver wanted to make their presence felt at high speed.
One high-profile incident that does come to mind was when Sebastian Vettel gave Lewis Hamilton a love-tap at the 2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix under safety car conditions.
While totally unacceptable, it was far less dangerous given the speeds they were going.
And so what was Vettel’s punishment? A 10-second stop-go penalty in the race – far worse than a grid penalty – and three licence penalty points.
You do the maths.
Discussion about this post